https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121902 Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Alexander Ploumistos <alex.ploumistos@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you for all the replies Zbigniew, it's been very educational. (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10) > (In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #9) > > Unversioned so-files > > pyinstrument: /usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/pyinstrument/low_level/stat_profile.cpython-311-x86_64-linux-gnu.so > > You didn't mention this one, but it is another similar case: rpmlint could > check > that this path is not in the shared library search path, and avoid the > useless warning. > Or it could even hardcode that anything with /site-packages/ can be ignored. > Instead, > we emit this warning for a large subset of the ~10k python packages. I didn't mention it, because I had already checked myself (as required): [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. > Updated. The only change is the license breakdown: > Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/pyinstrument.spec > SRPM URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/pyinstrument-4.4.0-3.fc39.src.rpm Something has glitched here, because rpmlint spews a new warning: pyinstrument.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.4.0-2 ['4.4.0-3.fc39', '4.4.0-3'] I trust you are more than capable of dealing with this - if indeed it needs to be dealt with. The package is approved. P.S.: I'll try to advance with input-remapper on Thursday, though realistically it's probably going to be the weekend, work has drained both my time and my brain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121902 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
