[Bug 2085444] Review Request: sgx-sdk - Software Guard eXtension software development kit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444



--- Comment #54 from xiangquan.liu@xxxxxxxxx ---
(In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #53)
> (In reply to xiangquan.liu from comment #52)
> > (In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #51)
> > > (In reply to Yunying Sun from comment #49)
> > > > Sorry for the delayed update. After the license change and various compiling
> > > > errors against rawhide being fixed, new version of spec and srpm are ready
> > > > for review now.
> > > > 
> > > > SPEC: https://yunyings.fedorapeople.org/sgxsdk.spec
> > > > SRPM: https://yunyings.fedorapeople.org/sgxsdk-2.19.100.0-1.fc39.src.rpm
> > > > Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=99176101
> > > > 
> > > > Please help to review it again. Thanks!
> > > 
> > > Some minor things.
> > > 
> > > The "Requires" should go after the "BuildRequires".
> > Agree to change it.
> >  
> > > Consider using the %autosetup macro instead of the %setup one.
> > 
> > $ cat /etc/os-release
> > NAME="Fedora Linux"
> > VERSION="39 (Rawhide Prerelease)"
> > ID=fedora
> > VERSION_ID=39
> > 
> > $ rpmbuild --eval=%autosetup
> > error: lua script failed: attempt to index a nil value
> > 
> > I did an experiment on fedora 39 and found %autosetup macro value is nil. So
> > could you please point how to use it?
> > 
> 
> %autosetup is a drop-in replacement for %setup, adding some more convenience
> for possible future patches:
> https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/autosetup.html  
> 
> > > Now the way you're creating the source strikes me a bit weird. So you get
> > > the github tarball, run a script and generate a different tarball that then
> > > is uploaded to some server? Isn't there a canonical release on github or
> > > somewhere else for that? I'll let other pitch in on that, however if you'd
> > > go that way the relevant script should be added in the source rpm alongside
> > > the SPEC and the process of creating the sources explained on a comment
> > > inside the SPEC.
> > > 
> > > An example of modifying the sources through instructions from the SPEC:
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-setuptools/pull-request/96#_1__6
> > > 
> > > And another example of having a script in the package tree to create
> > > modified sources (vendor_rust.py in this case):
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cryptography/tree/rawhide
> > 
> > If my understanding is right, we discussed this question before. There are
> > some pre-build binaries like aes which need to be downloaded first.
> 
> Could you point me to those discussions?

This is sub-ticket of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2030595 in
which you can find those discussions.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2085444
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux