https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184233 --- Comment #7 from Davide Cavalca <davide@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- We can add a knob for using libbpf-static, but tbh I don't really see the value in building against libbpf-static here. As Andrii said we need tight control on the version, so this is bound to move independently from the system one, even if it happens to match now. I'd rather be explicit and just use a bundled library and make it clear why we do so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184233 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
