https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 --- Comment #9 from Maxwell G <maxwell@xxxxxxx> --- Nobody's going to make you rename the package later for this kind of thing. As long as you use one of the allowed naming schemes based on your best judgement, you're in the clear :). To me, it seems like this is mainly a library, and that's why you're packaging it. From what I can tell, this was purpose built for Bottles to use as a library. The CLI was added after the rest of the library code [1]. On the other hand, vkbasalt-cli is billed as a CLI application, so I'd name the package vkbassalt-cli and add `%py_provides vkbassalt`. > Well, the project name needs to be normalized. So, if we are going with a library package the names should be python-fvs and python3-fvs respectively. That's correct and what I meant to suggest! I'd create a python-fvs component with a python3-fvs subpackage. The python3-fvs subpackage can have `Provides: fvs = %{version}-%{release}`. If you prefer the other way around, that's fine with me as well. [1]: https://github.com/mirkobrombin/FVS/commit/b447058773e29fd7adab6d585ae08c32f4565e26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2187061 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
