https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080743 --- Comment #17 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for the update, will complete the review later. > hope that is okay. However I have tried borrowing ppc64le machine to test it, it seems te library itself prepares fine. Even test do pass on that platform, because no tests cover validation or tsig features. I know no tool already using those features anyway. Sure. The affected code is not enabled by default, so it's not compiled and not run. The problem are broken dependencies. However, I've worked on an automated workaround for library crates with limited architecture support: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-a973e7d3eb I will update the "ring" package and a few related ones to use this approach, so dependent packages don't necessarily all need to add ExcludeArch if the "ring" / "rustls" depdendency is not part of the default feature set. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2080743 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
