https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179567 Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(benson_muite@emai | |lplus.org) | --- Comment #4 from Benson Muite <benson_muite@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Still get a warning - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION not sure why. The license file just has copyright information, but not the text of the MIT license. Made a pull request with that: https://github.com/bmewing/gpx/pull/11 Fedora-review gives the following errors: R-gpx.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib R-gpx.noarch: E: noarch-with-lib64 Should some exceptions be made for R packages? In this case: usr/lib64/R/library/gpx/R/gpx.rdb usr/lib64/R/library/gpx/R/gpx.rdx rdx and rdb files are in other R packages. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2179567 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
