https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161558 Petr Salaba <psalaba@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(psalaba@xxxxxxxxx | |m) | --- Comment #11 from Petr Salaba <psalaba@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #10) > @psalaba@xxxxxxxxxx > > 1) License is bad: > In LICENSE file: > The MIT (X11) License > In spec file: > License: GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl Fixed, changed license to MIT. > 2) No .rpmlintrc with warnings: > perl-Alien-Brotli-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation Created a .rpmlintrc with this warning filtered > 3) BuildRequires: findutils, make, bc > I don't see usage of this packages. > As i understand, make, bc is used in case of compiling, but not in our case Removed findutils and bc from requirements, make is still required in the rpm build process. > 4) spec file rpmlint: > perl-Alien-Brotli.spec:52: W: comparison-operator-in-deptoken 2>/dev/null) > perl-Alien-Brotli.spec:53: W: comparison-operator-in-deptoken 2>/dev/null) > > There is brotli %(perl -e 'print qq{ = $1} if qx{brotli --version} =~ > m{([\d+\.]+)}' 2>/dev/null) > Why we need this 2>/dev/null ? > If we need, then we need to add to .rpmlintrc This stderr redirection was not needed, if an error happens it should be visible in the build process stderr stream. Removed 2>/dev/null. Spec URL: https://psalaba.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-Brotli/perl-Alien-Brotli.spec SRPM URL: https://psalaba.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-Brotli/perl-Alien-Brotli-0.2.2-3.fc38.src.rpm Requested .rpmlintrc URL: https://psalaba.fedorapeople.org/perl-Alien-Brotli/perl-Alien-Brotli.rpmlintrc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161558 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue