https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 --- Comment #21 from David Shea <reallylongword@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #20) > (In reply to David Shea from comment #17) > > To clarify what was going on with the licenses: the specification for > > license-files is kind of in flux in the python-packaging specs, and 'wheel' > > and 'setuptools' (in setup.cfg) have different expected formats. On F36 and > > F37, wheel was mis-interpreting a license-file string in setup.cfg, and > > installing nothing. > > Is this a bug we might be able to fix? Do you have some details to your > investigation so I don't have to start from scratch? Feel free to open a new > bugzilla for python-wheel not to clutter this package review. Thanks. This package is fine now: I removed the license-files setting from setup.cfg, and the default pattern works. For packages where the default pattern doesn't work, the answer would be to specify things in pyproject.toml in the way that wheel expects (an array of globs). I avoided that here since this package needs setuptools, and the setuptools doc has a big "Provisionional, likely to change" note on that that key. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
