https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 --- Comment #20 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mattia Verga from comment #16) > I would expect license files of an installed package to reside under > /usr/share/licenses/ so I would not consider those as "duplicated". > Otherwise I would expect the license files under the dist-info to be > removed... There is no real reason for this expectation. See e.g. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/OHNVT5S4ZPOB56KAYNCWZOC6W2WAV54C/ (In reply to David Shea from comment #17) > To clarify what was going on with the licenses: the specification for > license-files is kind of in flux in the python-packaging specs, and 'wheel' > and 'setuptools' (in setup.cfg) have different expected formats. On F36 and > F37, wheel was mis-interpreting a license-file string in setup.cfg, and > installing nothing. Is this a bug we might be able to fix? Do you have some details to your investigation so I don't have to start from scratch? Feel free to open a new bugzilla for python-wheel not to clutter this package review. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133080 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
