https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 --- Comment #35 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Can we have noarch systemd-boot-unsigned-${efiarch} subpackages with sd-boot + sd-stub? I assume that you mean availability of a full set of systemd-boot-unsigned-{x64,ia32,aa64}.noarch on every architecture. I looked into this, and I don't see a way to do this in the current scheme of things. sd-boot is compiled against gnu-efi.{x86_64,i686,aarch64}. Our build infrastructure requires that all noarch packages are the same. So we'd need to build the arm64 variant on amd64 and vice versa. But the gnu-efi package for the foreign architecture is not available. For now, systemd-boot-unsigned.x86_64 has Provides:systemd-boot-unsigned-x64 and similarly for other architectures. I don't know how to do better at this momement, but as mentioned above, if somebody has a better idea, a pull request would be welcome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
