https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 --- Comment #34 from Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #33) > > Can we also make the packages noarch please, simliar to edk2? > > The package is archful because it takes systemd-udev or systemd-boot-unsigned > from the systemd build and "repackages" it. Oh, this is just the signing package. What is the plan for the unsigned packages? The stub would not be signed anyway and that is the more interesting case for cross-builds. Can we have noarch systemd-boot-unsigned-${efiarch} subpackages with sd-boot + sd-stub? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2079784 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
