https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142671 --- Comment #6 from Jonny Heggheim <hegjon@xxxxxxxxx> --- > You could do something like this: https://principis.fedorapeople.org/lua-cosmo.spec I feel that is getting too hackish and harder to maintain. > ln -s ../../doc/%{name}/cosmo.md LICENSE.md For me it does not make sense why %buildroot is not used in the %install section. The doc location is now hard-coded instead of a macro. If the user install with --nodocs flag, then the %license link is dangling. > I noticed you've removed the index.html from %doc, was this by mistake? I believe it's redundant so it should be fine to leave it out. I had a look and noticed that they were the "same", but after some thinking I lean towards that it is best to do the same as opensuse: > %license %{luarocks_treedir}/%{mod_name}/%{rock_version}/doc/cosmo.md > %docdir %{luarocks_treedir}/%{mod_name}/%{rock_version}/doc https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/devel:languages:lua/lua-cosmo/lua-cosmo.spec?expand=1 Include all files documentation in the doc folder, since upstream have included it in their repo and published it on luarocks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142671 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
