https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2148616 --- Comment #3 from Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I have also looked at clblast https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144680 It has a pretty good comparison benchmark with clblas, having to manually setup clblas to do that comparison is what led to this package. part of this clblast change is to deal with pocl not being available on epel. pocl not being in epel I have tried to address much earlier here https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096075 The tricky bit being how llvm libraries are delivered on rhel. checking with pocl could be done if pocl was installed and triggered with rpmbuild -ba --with check with the medium test being done, this takes a pretty long time with an nvidia card so it will likely take a very long time with pocl. In production i do not think pocl+clblast,clblas is a good fit, there are many other (better?) tuned cpu only blas libraries. Even so the clbast vs cpu is soooo bad when compared to clblast vs cuda,clblas. a - can you clarify what you are asking about public domain ? b.1 - this happens with all of the opencl project i have built recently even pocl. b.2 - i'll look into the warnings. c - ok, will change d - i would rather not have a separate subpackage and will remove doc/performance e - ok -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2148616 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
