https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119830 --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Kalvin McCallum from comment #5) > Package Review > ============== > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > Issues: > ======= > - Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir. > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#_devel_packages I wrote that already in comment #2. > ===== MUST items ===== > > C/C++: > [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. > [ ]: Package contains no static executables. Your review contains many entries which require manual review but are not marked with pass/fail/not-applicable. Please fill the unchecked boxes to make a complete review if you intend to take it up officially. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119830 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
