Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libvpd - C++ library for system vpd access https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=307891 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-12-18 12:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > libtool is in BuildRequires because the build process uses it to build the > libraries. - Really? Your spec file actually does not call libtoolize and currently I cannot find where actually libtool is needed. > This package provides a C++ library and a C library (libvpd_cxx and libvpd > respectively). On my system, rpmbuild does not fill out the Provides section so > when I would install something that depended on either of these I would get > unsatisfied dependency errors. rpmbuild automatically adds "Provides: libvpd_cxx-1.4.so.1", which should correctly remove the need of writing "Provides: libvpd_cxx", for example. If unsatisfied dependency error occurs, then I guess the dependency is _actually_ not satisfied (you cannot ignore soversion mismatch, for example). > I have not been able to get rpmlint to work on my debian or > gentoo systems yet. ... Please import Fedora system :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review