https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025084 Davide Cavalca <dcavalca@xxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(dcavalca@xxxxxx) | --- Comment #3 from Davide Cavalca <dcavalca@xxxxxx> --- > - should version be prefixed with 0^ ? Since it seems upstream uses YYYYMMDD snapshots. They might switch to a proper versioning scheme later on I don't think so, it looks like upstream is using the date as their versioning policy (as sometimes they'll publish dotted snapshots too) > Should this package be ExclusiveArch: x86_64? This package builds a number of ruby interpreters from source. I tested it on a aarch64 box and it works fine, so I don't think it needs ExclusiveArch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2025084 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
