https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134021 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #5) > > I agree that the dependency on pyproject-rpm-macros should be explicit and better yet versioned (somehow). > > Ok - versioned to make sure that manual intervention is required to make > sure that a new version of pyproject-rpm-macros works correctly I presume? New or old. I was thinking something like: Requires: (pyproject-rpm-macros >= 1.4.0 with pyproject-rpm-macros < 1.5~~) > Priority for now is to have a possibility to build packages which don't have setup.py. But still use setuptools? > ...I'm open to any solution which allows me to build the packages. So you have some examples I can examine? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2134021 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
