https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126348 Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags| |fedora-review? Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx CC| |jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires FIX: Please add build-requires: perl(base) - lib/Tickit/Pen.pm:356 perl(Carp) - lib/Tickit.pm:11 perl(Config) - spec file:54 perl(constant) - lib/Tickit/Pen.pm:357 perl(Errno) - t/30tickit.t:16 perl(integer) - lib/Tickit/Utils.pm:277 perl(IO::Handle) - lib/Tickit.pm:13 perl(List::Util) - lib/Tickit/RectSet.pm:11 perl(overload) - lib/Tickit/Pen.pm:345 perl(POSIX) - t/03utils.t:8 perl(Scalar::Util) - lib/Tickit.pm:15 perl(Test::Builder) - lib/Tickit/Test.pm:54 perl(Time::HiRes) - lib/Tickit.pm:16 perl(utf8) - t/03utils.t:23 perl(XSLoader) - lib/Tickit.pm:19 $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Tickit-0.73-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.7)(64bit) 1 libtickit.so.3()(64bit) 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(constant) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(IO::Handle) 1 perl(List::Util) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.36.0) 1 perl(overload) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(Struct::Dumb) >= 0.04 1 perl(Test::Builder) 1 perl(Tickit) 1 perl(Tickit::Debug) 1 perl(Tickit::Event) 1 perl(Tickit::Pen) >= 0.31 1 perl(Tickit::Rect) 1 perl(Tickit::RectSet) 1 perl(Tickit::RenderBuffer) 1 perl(Tickit::Term) 1 perl(Tickit::Test::MockTerm) 1 perl(Tickit::Utils) 1 perl(Tickit::Window) 1 perl(Time::HiRes) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.14.0 1 perl(warnings) 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) FIX: Please add run-requires: perl(XSLoader) - lib/Tickit.pm:19 $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Tickit-tests-0.73-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c | grep -v rpmlib 1 perl(Errno) 1 perl(IO::Handle) 1 perl(POSIX) 1 perl(Test::Builder::Tester) 2 perl(Test::Fatal) 1 perl(Test::Harness) 1 perl(Test::HexString) 1 perl(Test::More) 1 perl(Test::Refcount) 1 perl(Tickit) 1 perl-Tickit = 0.73-1.fc38 1 perl(Tickit::Pen) 1 perl(Tickit::Rect) 1 perl(Tickit::RectSet) 1 perl(Tickit::RenderBuffer) 1 perl(Tickit::StringPos) 1 perl(Tickit::Term) 1 perl(Tickit::Test) 1 perl(Tickit::Utils) 1 perl(Tickit::Window) 1 perl(Time::HiRes) 1 perl(utf8) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.14.0 1 perl(warnings) 1 /usr/bin/perl 1 /usr/bin/sh FIX: Please remove duplicated run-require 'perl(Test::Fatal)' FIX: Please add run-requires 'perl(constant)' $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Tickit-0.73-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Tickit) = 0.73 1 perl-Tickit = 0.73-1.fc38 1 perl(Tickit::Debug) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Event) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Pen) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Pen::Immutable) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Pen::Mutable) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Rect) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::RectSet) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::RenderBuffer) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::StringPos) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Term) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Test) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Test::MockTerm) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Utils) = 0.73 1 perl(Tickit::Window) = 0.73 1 perl-Tickit(x86-64) = 0.73-1.fc38 $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Tickit-tests-0.73-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl-Tickit-tests = 0.73-1.fc38 1 perl-Tickit-tests(x86-64) = 0.73-1.fc38 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Tickit* Rpmlint is ok FIX: In section %files, - please move LICENSE from %docs to %license - please remove META.json, it is only metadata - not useful FIX: The t/99pod.t has to be removed from perl-Tickit-tests. Test::Pod check works only for lib/ in the repository. t/99pod.t ................. 1/1 # Failed test 'POD test for lib' # at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Test/Pod.pm line 184. # lib does not exist # Looks like you failed 1 test of 1. t/99pod.t ................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100) Failed 1/1 subtests Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines. Please correct all 'FIX' items and provide a new spec file. Resolution: NOT Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126348 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
