https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954 --- Comment #14 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #13) > Still there are no matching SPEC and SRPM links for this package review. I get the feeling we are running in circles. Please read my previous comments regarding use of rpm-autospec. For more information on rpm-autospec, please visit: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpmautospec Moreover I followed the guide on how to upload the package. It mentions Copr specifically: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/New_Package_Process_for_New_Contributors/#upload_your_package I have read other package reviews, where the reviewer did not take issue with the spec file provided not matching the spec file in the SRPM due to the use of rpm-autospec. Here is one example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121114#c1 If you'd really like to use fedora-review with the spec file from the SRPM, you can extract it and instruct fedora-review to use that instead of the plain, unprocessed spec file, using the -n option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
