https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Sandro from comment #2) > > Issues: > > ======= > > - Dist tag is present. > > I've got no clue what that means. I think this is related to rpmautospec. No change is required then if you continue using %autorelease > > > - You don't need below lines as you already have "BuildArch: noarch" > > # Package does not provide debug info > > %global debug_package %{nil} > > Hmm. Without it my local mock build fails with: Okay then you can keep it in spec file but I will be interested in finding why it is required? Only few Fedora python* packages needed to add "%global debug_package %{nil}" > > - local definition of using the updated rpmautospec macro is not needed now > > as I see python-rpmautospec-0.3.0 is already built for F35+ and EPEL9 > > releases. > > The spec file I linked is from Copr, which expands %{autorelease} and puts > that in the spec file. I can upload my original spec file if needed. > Can you upload original spec file? > > python3-PyMunin3.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL-3.0 > > I changed it to "GPL-3.0-only" as per > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ Thanks > > Now, what's still missing is a fancy README file. ;-) Sure :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123954 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
