https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104533 --- Comment #9 from Maxwell G <gotmax@e.email> --- (In reply to Dave Dykstra from comment #8) > > - [!]: NOTICE mentions other license files. Shouldn't those also be > > installed? > > I don't see most of them in the source code. There's lib/uuid/COPYING. > The RHEL8 e2fsprogs package > > https://git.centos.org/rpms/e2fsprogs/blob/c8s/f/SPECS/e2fsprogs.spec > > includes only the NOTICE file. I'm not sure about the license policies for RHEL, but in Fedora, all licenses that apply to the code included in the package must be included and accounted for. > In fact that spec file lists only GPLv2 on > the main package, and fuse2fs is part of the main package. Maybe that would > be sufficient for this package after all. What do you think? The other > licenses are only on subpackages not installed. If you're sure that only the GPLv2 applies to the code included in the fuse2fs binary, then yes and please leave a comment above License: explaining that. Otherwise, all of the other applicable licenses must be part of the License tag and the license files must be marked with %license in files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104533 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
