https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107355 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hi, thanks for the review. a) Would be helpful to have a Koji/Copr build It's a noarch build, so the mock build that fedora-review does is "good enough". A build in copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zbyszek/pyparsing-3/build/4634236/ b) Ensure posted spec file matches that in the SRPM That's just fedora-review not understanding autochangelog. That diff is stuff added automatically by rpmautospec, and can be ignored. c) Is this program likely to be used through an egg interface? I don't have the least idea. There's a .dist-info directory, I hope that enough. There's one consumer of this — pyparsing — and it seems happy with the current packaging. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107355 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
