[Bug 250970] Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970


axel.thimm@xxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(axel.thimm@atrpms.|
                   |net)                        |




------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-12-12 09:59 EST -------
Note that the timestamps are not original. When I wrote the license on
Haupauge's behalf I also asked if I could pick the original files and that is
not possible due to internal reasons. So the timestamps that the files have on
both of my sites, ivtvdriver.org and atrpms.net are the ones from the extraction
time, not any upstream time.

Despite of that I agree it is better for people learning by reading specfiles to
keep timestamps otherwise they will be copying wrong idioms.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]