https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #2) > Okay, as long as the main dune package contains only the dune binary, I can > see how that would work. When a new version of OCaml is released, for > example, we could build ocaml-csexp and ocaml-pp with the old version of > dune, then build a new version of dune. Currently, the main package > contains more than just the dune binary, but I plan to change that along > with the upgrade to 3.x. > > Would you like me to strip out all the manual stuff and give you a new > version? If this would work, I definitely think it'd be better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
