[Bug 2101964] Review Request: ocaml-pp - Pretty printing library for OCaml

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964



--- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> ---
Okay, as long as the main dune package contains only the dune binary, I can see
how that would work.  When a new version of OCaml is released, for example, we
could build ocaml-csexp and ocaml-pp with the old version of dune, then build a
new version of dune.  Currently, the main package contains more than just the
dune binary, but I plan to change that along with the upgrade to 3.x.

Would you like me to strip out all the manual stuff and give you a new version?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2101964
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux