[Bug 2088450] Review Request: netopeer2 - Netopeer2 NETCONF tools suite

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088450

Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |https://github.com/CESNET/n
                   |                            |etopeer2



--- Comment #6 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Okay, better example is in unbound-keygen.service. named-setup-rndc.service is
started always, just the shell skips the action.

%post scriptlets are not executed at all in container based releases like
Fedora Silverblue. They have no way to execute them, because package contents
are installed different way.

I would guess the better would be auto-initialization on the first use. It
might require significant changes I understand. Or even design change in
netopeer2. It could watch timestamps in yang directory and trigger
initialization action when they would change from entry in current user's
~/.local directory? But that is what part which I would classify only as
SHOULD. The unowned directories are blocking the successful review.

It seems to me %{_datadir}/yang/modules should belong to (some sub)package of
yang library and it should depend only on that. Fill a bug on yang package and
make this review depens on that bug.

Add just:
# For provided systemd units
Requires: systemd
# for yang/modules directory, bug #xy
Requires: libyang


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2088450
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux