https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484 --- Comment #8 from Carl George 🤠 <carl@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I took a look at the spec file attachment, and things are looking real good, but two small new issues were introduced. I imagine you added `rpm --showrc` for troubleshooting, but it should not be included in the final spec file. Pro-tip, this command also works in a container. Make sure to install redhat-rpm-config (and epel-rpm-macros for EL releases) for all macros to be available. Your multi-line configure is missing an escape after --full-doc, so the conditional flags after that won't be included. One more thing, please post revisions to the package as new `Spec URL:` and `SRPM URL:` lines (with working URLs), similar to the original comment template. You don't have to repeat the `Description:` or `Fedora Account System Username:` lines. The fedora-review tool doesn't work with attachments, it expects URLs in that format and will pick the last occurrences of those lines in the comments of the given bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2086484 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
