https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081539 --- Comment #4 from Hedayat Vatankhah <hedayatv@xxxxxxxxx> --- Yes, sure. And thank you for reviewing my package :) Just a quick question (part of the above emails): should I package variable version of the fonts separately from the normal ones? I've seen that at least some fonts, e.g. the Noto fonts, have separate package for variable fonts (-vf subpackages), but I don't know if I should do the same (by definition, seems that all of them belong to a single family). If I can/should put them in a separate subpackage, what should their fontconfig file contain? For Noto (Arabic) fonts, I saw the variable fonts have 'have hints' (not the exact word) set to true while non-variable version has set it to false. I wonder if the same thing is correct for all variable fonts or it is just specific to Noto fonts? Thanks again, I'll upload a new version in a few hours. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2081539 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
