https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 --- Comment #23 from Jered Floyd <jered@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > > [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in > > trafficserver-selinux , trafficserver-devel , trafficserver-perl > > The selinux subpackage is fine as-is, but the rest need their "%{name} = > %{version}-%{release}" dependency updated to "%{name}%{?_isa} = > %{version}-%{release}". For trafficserver-perl, would it actually be more correct to add: BuildArch: noarch rather than adding the architecture to the dependencies? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
