[Bug 2076374] Review Request: trafficserver - Fast, scalable and extensible HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2 caching proxy server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374



--- Comment #9 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jered Floyd from comment #6)
> (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5)
> > > # trafficserver does not work properly with OpenSSL 3.0.2 yet
> > > # Upstream issue: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/7341
> > > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 36 || 0%{?rhel} >= 9
> > 
> > openssl1.1-devel does not exist in RHEL/EPEL 9, so you cannot build for RHEL
> > 9. The situation around openssl1.1 is weird. There's compat-openssl11 in
> > RHEL 9, but it doesn't provide devel content, and it's unusually crippled
> > (no FIPS support, for example). I'm not sure what we should do in EPEL about
> > it.
> 
> Ideally we fix this upstream so we can use OpenSSL 3.0 -- I haven't looked
> into this yet.  Are you recommending I remove the "|| 0%{?rhel} >= 9"
> condition for now?
> 
> 

Yeah, don't use OpenSSL 1.1 for RHEL 9.

> 
> > > %ghost %verify(not md5 size mode mtime) %{_sharedstatedir}/selinux/%{selinuxtype}/active/modules/200/%{modulename}
> > 
> > The %verify stanza is redundant for a %ghost file (which already doesn't do
> > any verification)
> 
> This is directly from the Fedora doc here:
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/IndependentPolicy#The_.
> 25files_Section
> 
> Are you suggesting a change to just:
>   %ghost
> %{_sharedstatedir}/selinux/%{selinuxtype}/active/modules/200/%{modulename}
> 
> ?

That policy is a draft, and to the best of my knowledge hasn't been agreed upon
yet.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux