https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 --- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Jered Floyd from comment #6) > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5) > > > > ExcludeArch: armhfp > > > > Please use "%{arm} %{ix86}" here (which expands to all 32-bit arm and x86 > > arches), "armhfp" isn't a real architecture. > > Will do. > > > > # trafficserver does not work properly with OpenSSL 3.0.2 yet > > > # Upstream issue: https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/issues/7341 > > > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 36 || 0%{?rhel} >= 9 > > > > openssl1.1-devel does not exist in RHEL/EPEL 9, so you cannot build for RHEL > > 9. The situation around openssl1.1 is weird. There's compat-openssl11 in > > RHEL 9, but it doesn't provide devel content, and it's unusually crippled > > (no FIPS support, for example). I'm not sure what we should do in EPEL about > > it. > > Ideally we fix this upstream so we can use OpenSSL 3.0 -- I haven't looked > into this yet. Are you recommending I remove the "|| 0%{?rhel} >= 9" > condition for now? > > > > > --enable-layout=Gentoo \ > > > > Umm, what? > > It's not possible to get all the files installed in the right locations with > command-line flags to configure, and the "Gentoo" layout for config.layout > is exactly correct. If you'd prefer I can duplicate the config stanza and > call it redhat? I fretted over that for a few minutes. See upstream: > https://github.com/apache/trafficserver/blob/master/config.layout > The Gentoo layout isn't correct. The libexecdir is /usr/libexec on Red Hat systems. It's actually also that now on Debian systems, too. Also, libraries go into /usr/lib64 on 64-bit arches on Red Hat systems, not /usr/lib... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2076374 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
