https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072752 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- OK. The two repositories look quite different indeed. But I don't think openexr.com should be used as URL: maybe use it in %description instead. The URL: field is for the *project*. > ## START: Set by rpmautospec > ... Whoah, where did that come from? I haven't seen something like that before… > Took your sugestion, I was planning to learn about it, found out this was the perfect ocasion, thx for the push. Hmm, and what about %autochangelog? One without the other is possible, but the whole point is make this as simple as possible. There is no reason to have a 'changelog' file in a *new* pacakge. The whole thing should be: Name: tinyexr Version: 1.0.1 Release: %autorelease ... %changelog %autochangelog (No other lines related to version, release or changelog.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2072752 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
