https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061730 --- Comment #6 from Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek@xxxxxxxxxx> --- So if we decide to go the split packaging way, my proposed packaging layout might look like this: - python3-staslib: the core module with most of the functionality - nvme-stas-stafd: stafctl, stafd.service, stafd - nvme-stas-stacd: stacctl, stacd.service, stacd (will require nvme-stas-stafd) Both the daemon packages contain minimal amount of code, not sure if this is worth the split from maintenance perspective - any savings would be minimal. No savings on dependencies either as most of the requirements would come from the base python3-staslib module. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061730 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure