[Bug 2061730] Review Request: nvme-stas - NVMe STorage Appliance Services

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061730



--- Comment #6 from Tomáš Bžatek <tbzatek@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
So if we decide to go the split packaging way, my proposed packaging layout
might look like this:
 - python3-staslib: the core module with most of the functionality
 - nvme-stas-stafd: stafctl, stafd.service, stafd
 - nvme-stas-stacd: stacctl, stacd.service, stacd  (will require
nvme-stas-stafd)

Both the daemon packages contain minimal amount of code, not sure if this is
worth the split from maintenance perspective - any savings would be minimal. No
savings on dependencies either as most of the requirements would come from the
base python3-staslib module.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2061730
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux