[Bug 2057302] Review Request: proxmark3 - The Swiss Army Knife of RFID Research

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057302



--- Comment #7 from marlin.soose@xxxxxxx ---
> Would it be worth making a -firmware subpackage and making it noarch? Assuming the firmware is arch independent and builds the same on different arches?

The client software prefers using "matched" firmware on the device, so building
and including a firmware image with sane defaults will allow this, without
requiring users to install a separate package. The firmware is small and is
ideally included in the package so users can 'hit the ground running'.

The spec builds clean once strip is overridden and debug disabled, which I
think is the least intrusive way to do this.

Are there any other blockers or changes to be made?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2057302
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux