Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=411471 Summary: Review Request: WebKitGtk - GTK+ Web Content Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx,notting@xxxxxxxxxx Spec URL: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/WebKitGtk.spec SRPM URL: http://pgordon.fedorapeople.org/for-review/WebKitGtk-1.0.0-0.1.svn28383.src.rpm Description: WebKit is an open source web browser engine. This package contains the GTK+ port. Note that even though both the Qt and GTK+ ports come from the same source tarball, upstream has advised me that they are not intended to be built together. (Indeed, attempting to do so causes quite catastrophic linking errs due to multiple symbol definitions, etc.) rpmlint also has some small complaints: > WebKitGtk-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib This is ignorable, as the devel subpackage contains only the DSO symlink, header files, and some other build data (such as a pkgconfig file). > WebKitGtk.x86_64: W: no-documentation > WebKitGtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation This is also ignorable. Currently, upstream does not ship anything which would be appropriate documentation. I've filed upstream bug #16300 to inquire about shipping a LICENSE file or similar. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review