[Bug 2054599] Review Request: python-specfile - A library for parsing and manipulating RPM spec files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054599



--- Comment #4 from Nikola Forró <nforro@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
Thanks Miro.

(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> I know of no distribution that has %pyproject_* macros but does not define
> %python3_pkgversion. Why do you think this is needed in the spec file? I
> believe it should be removed, but maybe I don't have all the information.

This comes from a template generated by rpmdev-newspec, I left it there just to
be safe. I'll remove it.

> (personal opinion) There is no good reason to define this macro. Consider
> not doing it. See
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.
> fedoraproject.org/message/BEW5NUG2T5OWSIRB7KGCVJRBCSBJZE37/ search for "As
> does Zbyszek,"

Ok, makes sense.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054599
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux