https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008 --- Comment #26 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andreas Schneider from comment #25) > > > Option 2 means that packages that explicitly request the ffmpeg package by > > > name will not work without RPM Fusion. This avoids the short-term pain I > > > mentioned in option 1, but eliminates our incentive to work on dynamically > > > expanding codec availability in the package in Fedora. > > > > I'd go with option 2. ffmpeg in RPM Fusion was "first" and is the fully > > featured package. I'd be happy to co-maintain ffmpeg-free in Fedora, too. > > Why not have the same name in Fedora and rpmfusion? It works fine for > openSUSE/Packman since 2015. It works in openSUSE because they have sticky vendors on by default. While we have the feature in DNF, we do not enable it by default yet. The sticky vendors feature means that if a package name is provided by one vendor vs another, the package manager won't auto-switch unless the user specifically requests the switch. Maybe one day we could make a Fedora Change to turn it on, but for now, we lack that feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
