https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008 --- Comment #25 from Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > > Option 2 means that packages that explicitly request the ffmpeg package by > > name will not work without RPM Fusion. This avoids the short-term pain I > > mentioned in option 1, but eliminates our incentive to work on dynamically > > expanding codec availability in the package in Fedora. > > I'd go with option 2. ffmpeg in RPM Fusion was "first" and is the fully > featured package. I'd be happy to co-maintain ffmpeg-free in Fedora, too. Why not have the same name in Fedora and rpmfusion? It works fine for openSUSE/Packman since 2015. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2051008 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
