https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033890 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Issues: > ======= > - Unnecessary versioned buildrequires > - meson >= 0.49 > Last 3 Fedora versions all have meson 0.59.4 or newer, so this should be > unversioned. > - pkgconfig(granite) >= 6.2.0 > Last 3 Fedora versions all have granite 6.2.0, so this should be > unversioned. > - pkgconfig(libhandy-1) >= 0.90.0 > Last 3 Fedora versions all have libhandy 1.2.3 or newer, so this should > be unversioned. Is this really a problem? I usually translate meson dev library requirements into BuildRequires 1:1 so I don't miss any constraints from upstream, so I'd like to keep them there. > - Duplicated icons > The package duplicates all icons in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*@2/ > directories. > Is this necessary, especially since they are svgs? Otherwise these should > be symlinked to avoid wasting storage space. This *is* weird. I have asked upstream why they install icons for double pixel density if they are just duplicates, and that the hicolor icon theme apparently does not supprt @2 at all: https://github.com/elementary/tasks/issues/321 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033890 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
