https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- You're right about the .ml files. I was thinking the toplevel-related .ml files might be needed, but it looks like that is not the case. I have removed them from the package. The rpmlint messages did turn up the fact that the shared objects were not linked with Fedora linker flags. I have corrected that, but some of the rpmlint warnings remain. That's because most of the shared objects only need symbols from the OCaml runtime, not the C library, and rpmlint issues warnings and errors about such shared objects. However, there is no error here. The shared objects function as they should. New URLs: Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-mtime/ocaml-mtime.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ocaml-mtime/ocaml-mtime-1.3.0-2.fc36.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028188 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
