https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021429 --- Comment #6 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I have found that the “edflib” C sources in this project are actually bundled from a separate project (https://gitlab.com/Teuniz/EDFlib/). That means we’ll need to follow the bundling guidelines (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling). I haven’t figured out yet whether it’s possible to build the Python package with an unbundled, separately-packaged edflib. I’d like to do that if it’s at all practical. Also, the byte-order issues seem to be in edflib. My quick research suggests that the EDF format is always little-endian, and edflib appears to be oblivious to endianness issues, so ExcludeArch: s390x may be required. Or, it may be possible to produce a reasonably-scoped patch. I will investigate further as I have time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021429 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
