https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979790 Hirotaka Wakabayashi <hiwkby@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(hiwkby@xxxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #12 from Hirotaka Wakabayashi <hiwkby@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hello Michel, Thanks a lot for your support! It is no problem if the patch will be imported to the Fedora repo. I have asked Davide to change the spec file because it was difficult for me to understand the how the patch will be checked in. Patch Guidelines say it is best practice to file it in an upstream bug tracker. But In this case, the patch is not filed yet there. So I have asked Davide to file it to the upstream bug tracker. Please see: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_all_patches_should_have_an_upstream_bug_link_or_comment Davide, I'll check for other issues today. I'm not going to block the review, so please forgive me. Thanks in advance, Hirotaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979790 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
