https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012522 --- Comment #12 from Maxwell G <gotmax@e.email> --- Hi everyone, I think we should push out yt-dlp and deal with replacing youtube-dl later. Youtube-dl and yt-dlp have different binary names and import paths, so there's no reason they can't both be in the repos. This will also allow Artem, the maintainer of `video-downloader`, to update that package to the latest release. `video-downloader` just switched from youtube-dl to yt-dlp[1]. I have cc'd Artem on this ticket. However, I'm still waiting for an official review and a sponsor. Is there something I can do to speed up the process? I already sent a self introduction email[2] to the devel list. Thanks, Maxwell [1]: https://github.com/Unrud/video-downloader/releases/tag/0.9.0 [2]: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/OLSKLGEXG5SEFC3ZSD6L2OGDWWQ4PI7G/#OLSKLGEXG5SEFC3ZSD6L2OGDWWQ4PI7G -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2012522 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
