[Bug 1983416] Review Request: gcc-epel - Various compilers (C, C++, Objective-C, ...)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983416



--- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Björn Persson from comment #7)
> You don't have a file named gcc-gobjc. I assume that you meant gobjc. Yes, I
> think that's acceptable.

Yes, sorry, I meant "gobjc (symlink)".

> I don't know how the FPC interprets those rules together, but let's go with
> gnatgcc and gobjc as separate files then.

Good catch, I've opened https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1099 to get
this clarified in general.

> · libgo-static and libgccjit still require the exact NEVR of gcc. Should
> those requirements also be relaxed?

Oh, yes...changed.

> · There is a grammar error: "rather" should be "rather than" in three places.

Corrected.

> I don't think that's a big problem, but since it's easy to do, why not make
> some links to the gcc manpage? Like this:

Good idea, done.

> - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
>   in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
>   for the package is included in %license.
>   Note: License file LICENSE.libgo is not marked as %license
>   See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
>   guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text
> 
> → That should probably be fixed, but in the Fedora package, not here.

I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005161 for that.


Spec URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/gcc-epel.spec
SRPM URL: https://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/gcc-epel-8.4.1-2.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983416
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux