https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999312 Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(code@musicinmybra | |in.net) --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- > My sed skills are a bit lacking, so I made a patch instead for the docs that are already packaged. Hopefully that's acceptable. I think I didn’t communicate clearly. Your original sed expression to fix the intersphinx inventories was fine. My complaint was just that you were rm’ing the objects.inv file in %build: > rm -rf html/.{doctrees,buildinfo} html/objects.inv and without that file, other packages can’t make intersphinx links to *your* documentation. My sample spec file with the massive sed command was just an example to show what *that* might look like, and demonstrate that there are real packages that do use these local intersphinx inventories. Feel free to keep it as a patch, or switch back to sed. ----- I’ll follow up on the re-review shortly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999312 _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
