Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for the Redet tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398261 ------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx 2007-11-25 08:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > There is no explicit license for the manual (as far as I can > tell), so I guess that GPLv2 like for redet is the best choice > for the license? Upstream re-released the 8.23 tarball. Redet is now GPLv3, and upstream thinks that the manual should be GPLv3 as well. > I would also suggest dropping the dependency on redet. One > may want to browse the documentation without having redet > installed. Most -doc packages (python-docs, bouml-doc) have the parent packages as a dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review