Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: redet-doc - Documentation for the Redet tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=398261 pertusus@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pertusus@xxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2007-11-25 06:25 EST ------- There is no explicit license for the manual (as far as I can tell), so I guess that GPLv2 like for redet is the best choice for the license? I would suggest dropping the %{?dist} since this is not dist specific. I would also suggest dropping the dependency on redet. One may want to browse the documentation without having redet installed. You could add a conflict for older redet versions, but I don't think it is worth it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review