[Bug 1980562] Review Request: catch22 - CAnonical Time-series CHaracteristics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980562



--- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #2)
> Running fedora-review against the F34 repo, because the Rawhide repo appears
> to be a bit broken at the moment.

Thanks for your review, Jerry.

Upstream says the native R package should be preferred to the wrapper here, so
I've dropped the R sub-package and I'll package that separately:
https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rcatch22/index.html

> Package Review
> ==============
> 
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> 
> ===== Issues ====
> 
> - I'm struggling a bit with the license.
>     - LICENSE contains the text of GPLv3
>     - wrap_Python/setup{,_P3}.py both identify the license as GPLv3
>     - wrap_R/catch22/DESCRIPTION identifies the license as GPLv2+
>     - All *.m files under Matlab identify the license as GPLv3+
> 
>   Does this imply that the license for the main package and the python
> wrapper
>   are GPLv3, but the R wrapper is GPLv2+, and the octave interface (not
>   currently built) is GPLv3+?

It would appear so. I've added licenses to each sub-package now to make it
clearer.

> 
> - The python3 and R subpackages do not require the main package, so need to
>   contain a copy of the license file.

Fixed

> 
> - The gcc invocation near the top of %build both compiles and links, so
>   $LDFLAGS should be passed to gcc as well as $CFLAGS.

Fixed

> 
> - Regarding the SHOULD item "Packages should try to preserve timestamps of
>   original installed files", add -p to the cp invocations in %prep.

Fixed.

> 
> - rpmlint says:
> R-catch22.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/lib64/R/library/catch22/help/AnIndex
> R-catch22.x86_64: E: zero-length
> /usr/lib64/R/library/catch22/help/catch22.rdb
> 
>   Did something fail to be generated correctly?
> 

R package dropped.

Updated spec/srpm:

Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/catch22/catch22.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/catch22/catch22-0.2.1-1.fc34.src.rpm


* Mon Aug 09 2021 Ankur Sinha <ankursinha AT fedoraproject DOT org> - 0.2.1-1
- Add sub-package specific licenses
- Add LDFLAGS
- Preserve time stamps
- Remove R sub-package: package Rcatch22 separately
- Run python test
- Add basic C test


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux