[Bug 1955394] Review Request: qatzip - Intel QuickAssist Technology (QAT) QATzip Library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955394



--- Comment #39 from zm627 <zheng.ma@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Vladis Dronov from comment #37)
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #38)
> For this I would just made necessary changes and pushed them as another
> commit
> without bumping a release and without updating a changelog.

Thanks Valdis and Ben!

But here's a simple question..
Should I bump the release number and add changelog to it?
I saw different opinions from your suggestions.
I prefer not to change bump the release number and changelog for the reason
it's not an updated lease.
(I did the 'fedpkg build' but not the 'fedpkg update')
But I DO remember that the guideline told me to bump the release number once a
build is failed.
This confuses me.

And another question is that should the release branch (eg f34) be exactly the
same with the rawhide branch? I mean in both the commit and source code.
It's certainly they can have different source code and git commits I think.

Thanks a lot!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux