https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1955394 --- Comment #37 from Vladis Dronov <vdronov@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to zm627 from comment #22) > And I have some questions here: > 1. Is there any mapping of versions between Fedora and Redhat? For example > the fc33 -> rehl 8.0 ? > Our team is preparing to make it included in Redhat 9.0 , so I'd like to > ask which version of Fedora should this rpm package be included. Hello, Zheng, RHEL9 is currently targeted to branch off Fedora 35 indeed. So, it would be great to build your package for the Rawhide and an active Fedora release, these being Fedora 35 (Rawhide) and 34. I've also run rpmlint with a .spec file, it says: qatzip.spec:52: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. Indeed, ./configure without --libdir= is called on line 52. Probably, this worth looking at. > 1. git revert > 2. change the repo hook For this I would just made necessary changes and pushed them as another commit without bumping a release and without updating a changelog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
